Skip to content
NOWCAST 바카라게임 온라인 바카라 게임 5 Today
Watch on Demand
Advertisement

Why Kate Middleton and Prince William don't technically have custody of George, Louis or Charlotte

A 300-year-old law means the royals don't technically have custody of their own children

Why Kate Middleton and Prince William don't technically have custody of George, Louis or Charlotte

A 300-year-old law means the royals don't technically have custody of their own children

Advertisement
Why Kate Middleton and Prince William don't technically have custody of George, Louis or Charlotte

A 300-year-old law means the royals don't technically have custody of their own children

온라인 바카라 게임.com.au and The Sun are reporting that technically, Kate Middleton and Prince William do not have legal custody over their children, Prince George, Princess Charlotte or Prince Louis due to a 300-year-old royal law that gives custody to the sovereign, aka the queen. This law applies to all minor grandchildren and means that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry will have to deal with it, too, when and if they decide to have children. 바카라 게임 웹사이트This goes back to King George I (who ruled in the early 1700s), and the law바카라 게임 웹사이트s never been changed," royal historian and expert Marlene Koenig told 온라인 바카라 게임.com.au. "He did it because he had a very poor relationship with his son, the future King George II, so they had this law passed that meant the King was the guardian of his grandchildren.바카라 게임 웹사이트 That law was passed in 1717 and hasn't been changed. That means the queen does have a say in decisions regarding George, Charlotte and Louis's education, upbringing and traveling. But Koenig added that the palace 바카라 게임 웹사이트doesn바카라 게임 웹사이트t make a big deal바카라 게임 웹사이트 out of the law these days. When Charles becomes king, he will have technical custody of his grandchildren but isn't likely to override major decisions. He is 바카라 게임 웹사이트very respectful of his son바카라 게임 웹사이트s parenting," Koenig said. 바카라 게임 웹사이트He understands they want to raise their children privately 바카라 게임 웹사이트 the only thing Charles might ask for is more pictures,바카라 게임 웹사이트 she added in jest.Constitutional expert Michael L. Nash echoed Koenig's points in "The Times" in 1993, per The Sun, when discussing Princess Diana's influence over Harry and William's upbringing. He wrote that the "Queen has the last word in the custody upbringing, education and even the right of abode of the princes, even during the lifetime of their father, Prince Charles. As for their mother, the Princess of Wales, her say is a matter of discretion and negotiation."

and are reporting that technically, Kate Middleton and Prince William do not have legal custody over their children, Prince George, Princess Charlotte or Prince Louis due to a 300-year-old royal law that gives custody to the sovereign, aka the queen.

This law applies to all minor grandchildren and means that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry will have to deal with it, too, when and if they decide to have children.

Advertisement

Related Content

바카라 게임 웹사이트This goes back to King George I (who ruled in the early 1700s), and the law바카라 게임 웹사이트s never been changed," royal historian and expert Marlene Koenig told 온라인 바카라 게임.com.au. "He did it because he had a very poor relationship with his son, the future King George II, so they had this law passed that meant the King was the guardian of his grandchildren.바카라 게임 웹사이트 That law was passed in 1717 and hasn't been changed.

That means the queen does have a say in decisions regarding George, Charlotte and Louis's education, upbringing and traveling. But Koenig added that the palace 바카라 게임 웹사이트doesn바카라 게임 웹사이트t make a big deal바카라 게임 웹사이트 out of the law these days.

When Charles becomes king, he will have technical custody of his grandchildren but isn't likely to override major decisions. He is 바카라 게임 웹사이트very respectful of his son바카라 게임 웹사이트s parenting," Koenig said. 바카라 게임 웹사이트He understands they want to raise their children privately 바카라 게임 웹사이트 the only thing Charles might ask for is more pictures,바카라 게임 웹사이트 she added in jest.

Constitutional expert Michael L. Nash echoed Koenig's points in "The Times" in 1993, per , when discussing Princess Diana's influence over Harry and William's upbringing. He wrote that the "Queen has the last word in the custody upbringing, education and even the right of abode of the princes, even during the lifetime of their father, Prince Charles. As for their mother, the Princess of Wales, her say is a matter of discretion and negotiation."